Tag Archives: Exelon

The Astronomical Cost of New Subsidies for Old Reactors: $280 Billion.

ny-bailout-protest_cropGreenWorld has covered the unfolding story of the American nuclear power industry’s clamor for new subsidies and bailouts since it started in 2014. Purely as a spectator sport, it might have been entertaining to watch the country’s largest utilities go from proclaiming a “Nuclear Renaissance” a decade ago to peddling the message that “Nuclear Matters.”

But there is just too much at stake to treat it like a game. The utility industry’s ramped-up efforts to block renewable energy and horde billions of our clean energy dollars to prop up old nukes risks both climate and nuclear disaster. Most of these proposals have been failing, thanks to the dogged persistence of grassroots activists and clean energy groups–and, it must be said, the outrageous sticker price of subsidies the industry needs. In fact, just this week, the two-year saga of FirstEnergy’s $8 billion nuclear-plus-coal bailout plan seems to have ended, with what amounts to a consolation gift to a couple FirstEnergy utility companies. Still an outrageous corporate giveaway, but no subsidies for nuclear or coal, even after it seemed like a done deal a few months ago.

But New York Governor Cuomo’s decision in August to award a 12-year, $7.6 billion subsidy package to four aging reactors–including reversing Entergy’s decision to close the FitzPatrick reactor this coming January–has put wind into the industry’s sails. Even that chapter isn’t over, with lawsuits already being filed and several more expected. And environmental groups this week launched a new campaign to get Governor Cuomo to smell the coffee and cancel what will not only be the largest corporate give-away in the state’s history, but relegate clean energy to second-class status behind old nukes.
Continue reading


New York Just Proved Why Bailing Out Nuclear Power Is a Bad Idea


New York approved a $7.6-$10 billion subsidy to prop up uncompetitive nuclear power plants–twice as much money as it will take for the state to achieve a goal to generate 50% of its electricity with renewables by 2030.

Yesterday, New York became the first state to adopt a policy to subsidize aging, uncompetitive nuclear reactors. The state’s Public Service Commission, which regulates utility companies, passed a Clean Energy Standard that combines a 50% renewable energy standard by 2030 with massive subsidies to prop up uneconomical reactors. (You can download the whole PSC order here.)

Prepare yourself for loud celebrations from the nuclear industry, heaping praise on New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and calling for other states to emulate the Empire State with lucrative incentives to insulate the nuclear industry from competition and to postpone closures of uneconomical reactors.

We hate to throw water on the parade, but the move actually proves what a bad idea it is to provide subsidies like this to prop up nuclear power. Let’s jump to the punch line, then we can fill in the blanks: New York just committed to spending twice as much money propping up old nuclear reactors than on new renewable energy, to get 2-3 times less energy from nuclear as renewables in the end.

Spend more, get less electricity, get more carbon emissions–and get a lot of radioactive waste. Continue reading

Exelon seems to think the rules are for others

Cover sheet of NRC letter to Exelon raising questions about the company's efforts to reclassify public documents on emergency planning.

Cover sheet of NRC letter to Exelon raising questions about the company’s efforts to reclassify public documents on emergency planning.

It might seem that we’re guilty of dumping on Exelon in these pages, which is possibly true, especially since there is an apparently endless supply of Exelon-initiated issues worthy of bringing to public attention. After all, Exelon is the nation’s largest electric utility, the largest nuclear utility, and while we haven’t developed a test for this yet, quite likely the nation’s greediest electric utility. Continue reading

How to take on the nuclear shills: here’s one approach.

Exelon's aging, unprofitable Quad Cities reactors.

Exelon’s aging, unprofitable Quad Cities reactors.

Earlier this month, we reported that climate scientist Dr. James Hansen and the pro-nuclear Breakthrough Institute’s Michael Shellenberger had leaped–apparently on their own–into the battle over the future of some of Exelon’s unprofitable nuclear reactors in Illinois.

In a nutshell, Exelon wants a taxpayer and/or ratepayer (it doesn’t really care where the money comes from) bailout to ensure that Exelon will receive a profit, whether the reactors themselves are profitable or not. They aren’t, and a Clinton reactor official (the most endangered of Exelon’s fleet) said this week that even with a bailout Clinton wouldn’t be profitable for “five to seven years.” Continue reading

How low can they go? Hansen, Shellenberger now shilling for Exelon

Exelon's Clinton reactor nearly bankrupted the small utility and rural co-ops that originally built it. Despite being bought for a few cents on the dollar by Exelon, it still isn't economic and Exelon is "threatening" to close it. Photo by cryptome.org.

Exelon’s Clinton reactor nearly bankrupted the small utility and rural co-ops that originally built it. Despite being bought for a few cents on the dollar by Exelon, it still isn’t economic and Exelon is “threatening” to close it. Photo by cryptome.org.

While some potential legal challenges remain, the approval of the Exelon-Pepco merger by the Washington, D.C. Public Service Commission means that Exelon is now not only the largest nuclear powered utility in the U.S., it is the largest electric utility period. And with that steady stream of regulated, and non-nuclear, Pepco money filling its coffers, you’d think that Exelon’s continuing “threats” to close up to three of its Illinois reactor sites unless it obtains more bailouts from beleaguered Illinois taxpayers and ratepayers would fall on deaf ears. Or maybe Exelon is now trying to achieve “too big to fail” status? Continue reading

Exelon: now the nation’s largest electric utility

This building--an artist's rendition--doesn't actually exist. Yet. But now that Exelon is the nation's largest electric utility, who knows what it could do?

This building–an artist’s rendition–doesn’t actually exist. Yet. But now that Exelon is the nation’s largest electric utility, who knows what it could do?

Exelon has long been the nation’s largest nuclear power utility. Now it is the nation’s largest electric utility, period.

Yesterday, the Washington, D.C. Public Service Commission, which had twice rejected the proposed merger of Exelon and D.C.’s local utility Pepco, voted 2-1 to approve the merger.  Within hours, Exelon and Pepco had filed the necessary paperwork to close down Pepco and have it subsumed by Exelon.

The vote was shocking. Last month, the PSC had again rejected the merger,  but proposed terms that it would find acceptable enough that it would approve the merger without another vote if all parties agreed to them. Only Pepco and Exelon agreed to the terms; D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, the People’s Counsel, the federal General Services Administration and the rest of the intervenors in the case rejected the terms.

Yesterday, the PSC approved the merger on its terms anyway–to the great joy of portions of the D.C. business community, which, as the Washington Post reported, “lobbied hard for the merger.”

The Post also reported that rate increases can be expected to occur immediately–as early as this summer. The entire point of the merger, from Exelon’s standpoint, is for the company to take the tidy and essentially guaranteed profits from the regulated and lucrative Pepco market and use them to resume payouts to its shareholders, which were suspended because of losses from Exelon’s failing nuclear power business. In other words, DC ratepayers will be bailing out Exelon’s nuclear losses. But Exelon isn’t willing to settle for simply tidy profits; thus the prospect of immediate rate increases and many more to come in ensuing years.

Ratepayers in other states, where Exelon has been seeking bailouts for its uneconomic reactors, shouldn’t expect any kind of relief however. Exelon will certainly continue pressing for large bailouts everywhere it has reactors; while there may a limit to its corporate greed, that hasn’t been proven yet.

The ramifications of the decision go well beyond D.C. however. A vote to deny the merger would have overturned earlier votes by FERC and regulators in Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey, all states in which Pepco has at least some presence (in Maryland, quite a large presence) to approve the merger. It would have scuttled the entire deal. You can see why the big business community’s lobbying was intense.

It’s possible, however, that Exelon and Pepco may have been a little premature in filing the papers to dissolve Pepco and become one big dysfunctional family. Opponents of the merger still have the opportunity to challenge the vote, and at least some of them, including Power DC–the umbrella group, including NIRS, that has led the opposition–are examining the available options. But whether the resources are available to mount an effective challenge is an open question.

PSC Chair Betty Ann Kane, who steadfastly opposed the merger throughout the process, hinted in her dissenting opinion that the merger itself may be illegal. Wrote Kane,

“Indeed, developments in the record since my “No” vote on February 26, 2016 give me even stronger reasons to find that the takeover of the District’s electric distribution company by a multi-faceted vertically integrated generation-focused holding company, as proposed in the order before us, benefits Pepco and Exelon shareholders but does not provide sustainable benefits to District ratepayers, places Pepco within a structure that is contrary to District law and policy, and should be rejected.”

The long PSC process–it first voted to oppose the merger last August–has been tainted by the whiffs of potential scandal involving various parties throughout. And while the majority of the PSC spelled out its thinking on the merger itself in its final decision,  the final vote, which was scheduled, cancelled, and re-scheduled in rather helter-skelter fashion at the last minute, raises questions that the decision does not address. The PSC needs to be more transparent and clear and explain what happened in these past few weeks and how it determined to approve the merger over the opposition of nearly every party involved.

When we last wrote about the merger following February’s PSC vote,  we included a timeline of major events leading up to the decision. But subsequent research revealed that we left some key items out, so here is the full timeline of events known of to date:

April of 2015: FreshPAC launched. Close allies of the Mayor launch a highly controversial political action committee called FreshPAC. A quirk in DC campaign laws allows unlimited contributions to the super PAC from companies and businesses, including those with business before the Mayor and City Council. The PAC is highly criticized by the media, voters, and members of the City Council as a fund that appears open to abuse and pay-to-play politics.

August 25, 2015: Exelon-Pepco merger rejected. The DC Public Service Commission unanimously rejects the proposed Pepco-Exelon merger as a fundamental “conflict of interest.”

September 18, 2015: Pepco pays Mayor’s office $25 million in “Soccergate” deal. Pepco gives the Office of the Mayor $25 million in cash for vague naming rights of property adjacent to the proposed new soccer stadium at Buzzard Point. The structure of the deal is highly unusual. Researchers have not been able to find another deal like it in the country. Not only is all the money paid up front, at a very high price (proportionally more than the Verizon Center naming rights deal), but the brevity and minimized complexity of the two-page legal agreement is virtually unprecedented.

September 19, 2015: Exelon presents merger “settlement” financial terms the day after “Soccergate” payment. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show that, the very next day after the soccer deal, Exelon submits new financial information to the Mayor’s office for settlement purposes.

Sept. 30 2015: Exelon hires FreshPAC chairman Chico Horton to lobby city officials (Horton’s disclosure filing). It is the first time that Horton or the law firm he works for (Graves, Horton, Askew & Jenkins, LLC) has ever filed a lobbyist registration in the District of Columbia.

Sept. 30: DC files eminent domain for land at Buzzard Pointthe last land acquisition necessary for the DC United soccer stadium project to proceed–with $21 million from the Pepco naming rights deal.

Oct. 1: FreshPAC receives its largest number and total amount of contributions at a fundraiser.

Oct. 6 – Mayor Bowser signs the settlement with Exelon and Pepco.

Oct. 10: FreshPAC receives another large haul in contributions from businesses.

Oct. 16: Exelon files with PSC its request for expedited review of the settlement agreement with Mayor Bowser.

Oct. 20: DC City Council introduces PAC reform bill.

Nov. 7: Mayor goes to China with FreshPAC donors. Mayor Muriel Bowser makes a high-profile visit to China, to encourage international investment in the District of Columbia. She brings with her representatives of two businesses whose owners made contributions to FreshPAC on October 1.

November 10, 2015: FreshPAC is disbanded after widespread criticism. Critics charged it represented a pay-to-play PAC that tarnished DC politics and the Mayor’s public integrity. Exelon continues to refuse to say whether it was asked to donate to FreshPAC while working with the Mayor’s office on a settlement that would give the company its prized $6.8 billion merger.

December 16, 2015: WAMU reveals that former FreshPAC chair registered to lobby for Exelon on the merger. News breaks that Chico Horton, the director of FreshPAC, registered to lobby for Exelon on the merger on September 30, 2015 – the same time that Exelon was negotiating a settlement with the mayor and while FreshPAC was still active and soliciting huge donations from businesses.

January 2016: Chico Horton, the Exelon lobbyist, says he did no “lobbying.” The former head of Bowser’s FreshPAC declares that he did no lobbying – zero – for Exelon during the intense autumn negotiations between Exelon and the Mayor’s office, despite registering as an Exelon lobbyist. Horton said he simply gave the company “strategic advice” that did not officially constitute lobbying.

February 2016: Documents indicate Mayor’s office misled the public on merger negotiations. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act indicate that the Mayor’s office repeatedly misled the public as to who in her administration actually coordinated and led the merger settlement negotiations between the city and Exelon. The Mayor claimed and still claims that City Administrator Rashad Young and Tommy Wells, head of the Department of the Environment and Energy, led the negotiations. But FOIA documents show that they were informed of key settlement terms after the deal had been negotiated by others close to the Mayor. Who actually led those talks, and what connection to Exelon or Pepco the city negotiators might have had, is still not known. But it was not Wells or Young, as was claimed. Why the discrepancy?

February 26, 2016: PSC gives conditional approval to the merger. Little substantive changes were required on top of the Mayor’s wholly inadequate settlement. Opponents assert the merger is still a fundamental “conflict of interest” and the process was clearly influenced by big-money “pay-to-play” politics.

Michael  Mariotte

March 24, 2016

Permalink: https://safeenergy.org/2016/03/24/exelon-now-the-nations-largest/

Your contributions make publication of GreenWorld possible. If you value GreenWorld, please make a tax-deductible donation here and ensure our continued publication. We gratefully appreciate every donation of any size.

Comments are welcome on all GreenWorld posts! Say your piece. Start a discussion. Don’t be shy; this blog is for you.

If you’d like to receive GreenWorld via e-mail, send your name and e-mail address to nirsnet@nirs.org and we’ll send you an invitation. Note that the invitation will come from a GreenWorld@wordpress.com address and not a nirs.org address, so watch for it. Or just put your e-mail address into the box in the right-hand column.

If you like GreenWorld, help us reach more people. Just use the icons below to “like” our posts and to share them on the various social networking sites you use. And if you don’t like GreenWorld, please let us know that too. Send an e-mail with your comments/complaints/compliments to nirsnet@nirs.org. Thank you!

GreenWorld is crossposted on tumblr at https://www.tumblr.com/blog/nirsnet

The nuclear industry’s game plan to take your money and keep reactors operating

Exelon again threatens to close its aging, uneconomic, Fukushima-clone Quad Cities reactors--a threat that would be better as a promise.

Exelon again threatens to close its aging, uneconomic, Fukushima-clone Quad Cities reactors–a threat that would be better as a promise.

With the failure of last decade’s nuclear “renaissance” leading to dismal prospects for expansion, and rising operating costs–including modest and insufficient post-Fukushima improvements–making a large number of existing reactors uneconomic in the deregulated marketplace, the nuclear power industry over the past couple of years has focused on its sheer survival. This means bailouts in one form or another. Continue reading