The Department of Energy (DOE) has a new generation of leadership; “larger than life” John Kotek is promoting nuclear energy via selling a “durable solution” to the problem of deadly radioactive waste that is the direct result of generating electric power from the heat of fission. Without a perceived solution to handling this existential problem, promotion of more nuclear energy usually falls on deaf ears. After all, wastes that will be a hazard to all life on Earth over the next million years, even when contained, do pose a threat. And the DOE’s track record on radioactive waste, exemplified by the failed Yucca Mountain project, hardly inspires confidence. Continue reading
A Nuclear Newsreel today focused mostly on clean energy developments…Note: GreenWorld will not publish tomorrow, March 28, 2014 (the 35th anniversary of the Three Mile Island accident). We’ll be back on Monday, March 31 with a special Opening Day essay! Watch for it.
Another one bites the dust. A major investor drops out of proposed Finnish-Russian nuclear project. Doesn’t anyone want a piece of this thing? Apparently not anyone with economic sense.
The Department of Energy is dangerously close to approving the release of some radioactive material into the general marketplace. In response, NIRS has launched a new campaign aimed at encouraging DOE to make permanent an existing moratorium on such practices. You can take action to encourage DOE here.
First, it was Goldman Sachs. Then Morgan Stanley. Now a new report from Citigroup agrees: the solar revolution is here. The report “notes that nuclear and coal are structurally disadvantaged because both technologies are viewed as uncompetitive on cost. Environmental regulations are making coal even pricier, and the aging nuclear fleet in the US is facing plant shutdowns due to the challenging economics. ‘We predict that solar, wind, and biomass to continue to gain market share from coal and nuclear into the future,’ the Citi analysts write.” Indeed, Citigroup says that the “levelized cost of energy,” the key metric in analyzing costs of different energy sources, indicates that all forms of renewables except marine are already cheaper than nuclear power and that both coal and nuclear are pricing themselves out of the market.
There’s nothing new about this except the report released by American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), but it’s worth remembering anyway: energy efficiency remains the cheapest and fastest means of addressing climate and energy issues. Every dollar spent on efficiency brings back $1.24 to $4 in total benefits to consumers. And, at 2.8 cents/kWh, electricity efficiency programs are one-half to one-third the cost of even the cheapest generation technologies (and way cheaper than nuclear power).
The right wing loses again in its effort to block renewable energy. Although the Kansas Senate had voted to repeal the state’s Renewable Energy Standard–as pressed for by American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Koch Brothers groups, etc., it actually is very popular in the state. So the Kansas House rejected the Senate and voted 77-44 yesterday to keep the state’s RES. So far, this year is going like last year: the far-right has failed in its every effort to stymie renewable energy. Let’s hope (and work to make sure) that trend continues.
One of the targets of the far-right groups like ALEC is solar net metering programs. These enable people with rooftop solar installations to sell back excess power to utilities at a reasonable cost. But the far-right thinks they’re a burden on utilities and that homeowners should get far less money through these programs (actually, they think the programs shouldn’t even exist). But in Minnesota, the state has determined that their existing net metering programs are actually priced far too low for the social benefits solar power brings. So the state Public Utilities Commission is planning to increase the rates utilities must pay for rooftop solar generated power. The formula Minnesota used to make this determination is something that could and should be followed by other states.
Despite Russia’s armed takeover of Crimea, Ukraine is expected to continue to provide Crimean solar plants with feed-in tariff support–support that is among the most generous in the world. This will enable solar plants in Crimea to continue operating; that wouldn’t be clear if the plants had to rely on Russia. There are several large solar plants in Crimea, with the biggest able to produce 100 Megawatts of solar power.
March 27, 2014
You can now support GreenWorld with your tax-deductible contribution on our new donation page here. We gratefully appreciate every donation of any size–your support is what makes our work possible.
Comments are welcome on all GreenWorld posts! Say your piece above. Start a discussion. Don’t be shy; this blog is for you.
If you like GreenWorld, you can help us reach more people. Just use the icons below to “like” our posts and to share them on the various social networking sites you use. And if you don’t like GreenWorld, please let us know that too. Send an e-mail with your comments/complaints/compliments to email@example.com. Thank you!
Note: If you’d like to receive GreenWorld via e-mail daily, send your name and e-mail address to firstname.lastname@example.org and we’ll send you an invitation. Note that the invitation will come from a GreenWorld@wordpress.com address and not a nirs.org address, so watch for it.