Exelon doesn’t “intend” to shut down any reactors

On the chopping block? Exelon's uneconomic Clinton reactor in central Illinois.

On the chopping block? Exelon’s uneconomic Clinton reactor in central Illinois.

Language matters. When a top Exelon exec, chief strategy officer Bill Von Hoene, said this week that the giant nuclear utility doesn’t “intend” to close any of its nuclear reactors anytime soon, you can be sure he was being careful with his language.

“We do not want to, and we don’t intend to close plants,” Bill Von Hoene, Exelon’s chief strategy officer, said. “We have no plans to do that now.”

That’s pretty far short of a denial that they won’t close any of their reactors, however.

No nuclear utility has ever “intended” to close a reactor early. The utilities that closed reactors last year did so not because they wanted to, but because their continued operation had become irrational.

Von Hoene admitted that–as has been well-reported in GreenWorld and elsewhere–some of Exelon’s reactors are in trouble: “Von Hoene acknowledged that relatively low prices for electricity, sluggish demand and competition from renewable energy put some of Exelon’s nuclear plants at risk of closing.”

Exelon needs a ratepayer and/or taxpayer bailout, or, in their obfuscatory language, “regulatory or legislative relief” to avoid closing reactors.

The company also needs approval of its proposed merger with the Washington, DC area utility Pepco. But that approval is a long way off, and is by no means certain. Regulators in both Washington, DC and Maryland are going to be looking at the idea closely–and citizens groups in both jurisdictions are mobilizing to block any such merger. In Maryland, for example, approval of the merger would mean some 80% of the state’s electricity customers would be buying power from one utility–the out-of-state Exelon. That certainly isn’t the intent of Maryland’s existing electricity deregulation law, which is designed to encourage competition in the electric sector, not stifle it.

Nor does Exelon, with its outright hostility to wind power (it was the first and only utility to get kicked out of the American Wind Energy Association for its anti-wind stance) and its blatant lack of interest in solar power, seem the ideal company to would lead the way in meeting Maryland’s popular renewable energy standards and energy efficiency programs.

Merger approval is not going to be a slam dunk for Exelon in either DC or Maryland.

And Exelon’s “intent” is not likely to square with the reality the company will face over the next 18 months.

Michael Mariotte

July 11, 2014

Permalink: https://safeenergy.org/2014/07/11/exelon-doesnt-intend-to-shut-down-any-reactors/

You can now support GreenWorld with your tax-deductible contribution on our new donation page here. We gratefully appreciate every donation of any size–your support is what makes our work possible.

Comments are welcome on all GreenWorld posts! Say your piece above. Start a discussion. Don’t be shy; this blog is for you.

If you like GreenWorld, you can help us reach more people. Just use the icons below to “like” our posts and to share them on the various social networking sites you use. And if you don’t like GreenWorld, please let us know that too. Send an e-mail with your comments/complaints/compliments to nirsnet@nirs.org. Thank you!

GreenWorld is now posted on tumblr at https://www.tumblr.com/blog/nirsnet

Note: If you’d like to receive GreenWorld via e-mail daily, send your name and e-mail address to nirsnet@nirs.org and we’ll send you an invitation. Note that the invitation will come from a GreenWorld@wordpress.com address and not a nirs.org address, so watch for it.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Exelon doesn’t “intend” to shut down any reactors

  1. Peter Sipp

    I see in the Wall Street Journal where entergy fell $ 4.33 last week in two days, exelon fell last week too. not as much, but fall it did. This week they both lost value…again. Looks like people are jumping ship while the stocks have a little value left. It won’t be too much longer and those stocks will be liabilities. What with the tons & tons of irradiated metals & nuclear waste (for which there is NO solution for). The people in the future will not be happy with the nuclear waste or the irradiated metals. Only a stupid bird fouls it’s own nest.

    Reply
  2. paxus

    We however do “intend” to block nuclear bailouts to Exelon and every other nuclear vendor which is trying to rip us off further for this boondoggle technology.

    Reply

We welcome your comments here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s