Activists pay attention: the nuclear industry wants to rig your rates

It seems like every day we’re seeing stories like this one: Pilgrim’s owner pushes for market changes to help keep the nuclear plant open, indicating the nuclear industry’s public relations arm is hard at work pushing out its position that consumers should pay more for nuclear power than other sources of electricity just because it’s nuclear power. Not to criticize the reporters covering the issue–it IS news that the industry wants to rig the system for its benefit. This is a major campaign on the industry’s part; indeed, the industry’s basic survival–or at least the survival of its older and less-economical reactors–may depend on it. So far the industry has been vague about what kind of market changes it actually wants, and in the deregulated marketplace in which the most threatened reactors operate, the market is working pretty much as it is supposed to–providing ratepayers with the lowest-cost electricity. Still, it appears that the operators of the PJM grid, which covers much of the eastern third of the country, may be listening to the industry. Utility Dive reports today that a new PJM report indicates that “About 14,600 MW, or 8% of PJM’s installed capacity, is at risk of retiring early because of flaws in the market, according to the 2013 State of the Market report, released Thursday.” The story adds that, “This report is a signal that changes will be coming to PJM’s market rules.”

The Pilgrim reactor in Plymouth, MA is threatened by its inability to supply electricity at a competitive price. Photo, NRC.

The Pilgrim reactor in Plymouth, MA is threatened by its inability to supply electricity at a competitive price. Photo, NRC.

The changes proposed are complex and full of “utility-speak;” they’ll require some analysis, which we hope to provide soon. But any changes that artificially bolster nuclear power over renewables simply to avoid shutdown of aging, unreliable and expensive nuclear reactors must be fiercely resisted. The venues–before organizations like PJM and agencies like FERC–may be unfamiliar to most anti-nuclear and clean energy activists, but learning how to effectively engage in these venues is a task of immediate importance.

Michael Mariotte

March 13, 2014


Comments are welcome! Say your piece above. Start a discussion. Don’t be shy; this blog is for you.

If you like GreenWorld, you can help us reach more people. Just use the icons below to “like” our posts and to share them on the various social networking sites you use. And if you don’t like GreenWorld, please let us know that too. Send an e-mail with your comments/complaints/compliments to Thank you!

You can also now support GreenWorld with your tax-deductible contribution on our new donation page here. We gratefully appreciate every donation–your support is what makes our work possible.

Note: If you’d like to receive GreenWorld via e-mail daily, send your name and e-mail address to and we’ll send you an invitation. Note that the invitation will come from a address and not a address, so watch for it.


One thought on “Activists pay attention: the nuclear industry wants to rig your rates

  1. Pingback: Goldman Sachs Sees a Solar Future | American Friends Service Committee of Western Massachusetts

We welcome your comments here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s