Sen. McCain says he won’t deal with climate bills unless they include a lot of nukes

unflattering-mccain-pic-12A decade ago, Sen. John McCain was one of the Senate’s leaders on climate change–meaning that he actually co-sponsored (with former Sen. Joe Lieberman) a major bill to address climate that was to be the Senate’s vehicle on the issue. That bill never passed, of course; even it was too radical for the Senate then (although “radical” is an absurd word to use to describe an extremely moderate piece of legislation). And with a growing number of climate deniers entering Congress in recent years, the odds of any major climate legislation getting through the current Congress are nil. For his part, while Sen. McCain never became a climate denier himself, he stopped talking about the issue when he began to run for president in 2007 and it wasn’t an issue he talked about during the 2008 presidential campaign either. Nor has he introduced or co-sponsored any climate legislation since then, nor has he been talking about the issue–and considering how often McCain manages to get himself on Sunday TV newstalk shows and other public arenas, if he had been talking about climate, you would have known it.

So it’s a bit of a surprise to see McCain raising the issue at all this week. But don’t get your hopes up; he only raised the issue in the context of nuclear power, saying that until “the Left” embraces nuclear power–and by that he means “a lot of nuclear plants,” he won’t support any climate legislation. Well, ok John, we weren’t really expecting you to support anything as rational as climate legislation that might actually be effective–that would mean excluding nuclear power. But if the only thing you have to say is that you won’t support legislation to address a problem you once believed in unless it props up an industry undeserving of support, why say anything at all? After all, it’s not like McCain has introduced any climate legislation in about 10 years, nor is he likely to now.

Michael Mariotte


Comments are welcome! Say your piece above. Start a discussion. Don’t be shy; this blog is for you.

If you like GreenWorld, you can help us reach more people. Just use the icons below to “like” our posts and to share them on the various social networking sites you use. And if you don’t like GreenWorld, please let us know that too. Send an e-mail with your comments/complaints/compliments to Thank you!

Note: If you’d like to receive GreenWorld via e-mail daily, send your name and e-mail address to and we’ll send you an invitation. Note that the invitation will come from a address and not a address, so watch for it.


2 thoughts on “Sen. McCain says he won’t deal with climate bills unless they include a lot of nukes

    1. Peter Sipp

      The would be cheerleaders try hard using the same depleted comments. Their “industry” is dead. Of course the n. waste will have to be tended safely for, mmm, er… ahhh… 100,000+ years. The sooner all the reactors are closed the better!!!.
      The likely hood of a national “repository” lessens by the day. There would have to be thousands of shipments to that one spot. There would be accidents, releases of radiation.
      PLUS!!!, radiation has the ability to destroy ANY container. The containers would have to be replaced thousands of times. Where would they ( the cheerleaders) put these newly radiated containers ?????
      N. power is the MIDAS TOUCH in REVERSE!!! The n. waste needs to stay RIGHT where it is NOW. The n.industry claims they are inherently SAFE.
      SO be it., PROVE TO US HOW SAFE THE WASTE IS !!!!!! Keep the n. waste on the utilities property!!!!!


We welcome your comments here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s